The SEC’s rulemaking is clear on what needs to be done, but it does not provide a roadmap for building strategic decision-making processes that would support the required disclosures.
There have been many discussions around the difficulties presented by the disclosures required when a company has a cyber event, including the fact that these disclosures would be made while the corporation is in the early stages of managing a crisis and could raise alarm bells before the firm has all the information needed to respond to public concerns.
But this fear underlines the fundamental problem that the SEC is trying to address. Cyber attacks and data breaches are the number one risk facing organizations globally and predicted to remain so through at least 2026. Cyber events can have an impact all areas of an organization. The fallout from a reputation crisis can be far greater than any short-term earnings losses, with some companies losing significant shareholder value.
What should public companies do?
1. Define a process to implement cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance.
Board Assessment
- How is the board overseeing, managing, and enabling cyber risk management across the enterprise?
- Conduct risk management, strategy, and governance reviews in collaboration with legal
- Prepare and submit disclosures that communicate how cyber risk is being managed
Define Risk Appetite
- Focus on priorities
- Allocate resources
- Optimize outcomes in the context of risk reduction
Enterprise Risk Assessment
- Use pre-defined risk appetite as the framework
- Assess how risk is being managed throughout all phases of the risk lifecycle:
- Identify and assess risks
- Implement proper controls
- Establish capabilities to ensure that the organization can recover from an adverse incident
- Address weaknesses in current control implementations
- Monitor the threat landscape for emerging threats
2. Disclose material cybersecurity incidents.
Risk Quantification
- Conduct scenario-based impact quantification studies
- Quantify results in the context of corporate risk tolerance
- Understand the near- and long-term financial impacts of adverse cyber events
- Create materiality decision-making framework around results
Response Review
- Create internal processes and capabilities for management decisions-making around materiality and disclosure
- Document processes in plans and playbooks
- Link and coordinate risk management, business continuity planning, disaster management and disaster recovery plans to board, legal and compliance oversight
Materiality Workshops and Exercises
- Stress test the components, data inputs and responsibilities through simulation
- Engage outside resources (particularly legal and public relations) in simulations to ensure consistency of protocols and messaging
- Engage senior leadership to understand and define roles and responsibilities in making materiality decisions
- Refine and repeat the exercise as the corporate structure, risk profile and threat environment evolve
Aon has global resources and capabilities to help companies put a structure in place to make better decisions and implement these across a corporate framework. Importantly, Aon can also structure risk financing solutions to mitigate the impacts of cyber events directly with Cyber Insurance and Directors & Officers Insurance.